<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feeding Pigeons in the Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/</link>
	<description>Enjoy Sizzling, Unstoppable Confidence and Steel-Trap Determination that Never EVER Quits - Kick the Slats out of the &#34;Box&#34; around Your Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlesB</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Russ - Yeah, I can identify with Maggie&#039;s concerns. The exact same things cross my mind every time I leave a comment somewhere. That&#039;s what throwaway emails are for, though. Still and all - seven or eight thousand visitors in a typical month, and what I wrote was so weak that only five or ten have any reaction to it at all? Keeps me wondering if my stuff&#039;s too tame, too boring, too ordinary? You can kind of understand what prompts some bloggers to step way out into controversy-land.

Charlie - And thank you... I needed THAT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ &#8211; Yeah, I can identify with Maggie&#8217;s concerns. The exact same things cross my mind every time I leave a comment somewhere. That&#8217;s what throwaway emails are for, though. Still and all &#8211; seven or eight thousand visitors in a typical month, and what I wrote was so weak that only five or ten have any reaction to it at all? Keeps me wondering if my stuff&#8217;s too tame, too boring, too ordinary? You can kind of understand what prompts some bloggers to step way out into controversy-land.</p>
<p>Charlie &#8211; And thank you&#8230; I needed THAT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Further to my last post...

I was talking to Maggie at breakfast this morning about leaving comments.  Rarely does she ever leave comments, even on my own blog.  This is HER perspective:

PRIVACY - most blog comments ask for a name and email address.  Maggie is extremely cautious about giving her email for fear of being spammed, regardless of the blog owner&#039;s privacy policy.

TOO MUCH WORK - some blog comments make you jump through too many hoops - register, wait for confirmation email, login... by the time a person gets through all that, they are too ticked off to leave a comment.

Speaking of different perspectives but on a completely different tangent:

We were talking with my little six-year-old step daughter about the possibility of getting a little kitty next year when her older sister goes to live with her dad.  The conversation turned to the many responsibilities of pet ownership.  One of the things we discussed was veterinarians (vets).  Curious, my little one asked, &quot;Russy, what&#039;s a vet?&quot;

I answered, &quot;It&#039;s an animal doctor.&quot;

Ambrosia returned surprised, &quot;You mean it&#039;s not a person?&quot;

It took me a second to realize that she HEARD me say that the animal doctor was... AN ANIMAL!

That&#039;s what we get from watching too much &#039;Treehouse&#039;.  LOL

But it also proves that we ALL have different perspectives.  There is NO END to the many different permutations and spins we can have on any topic.  

Bottom line again... your comments add so much value and enrichment to your favorite blogger&#039;s posts.  I know I am ALWAYS delighted to get any kind of comment because it means I have an audience with a pulse, and I am stimulating them enough to elicit a response.  

I join Charles in encouraging every reader to leave a response if the articles move you, enlighten you, or simply entertain you in some way.  It&#039;s why bloggers write!

All the best from Toronto,
Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post&#8230;</p>
<p>I was talking to Maggie at breakfast this morning about leaving comments.  Rarely does she ever leave comments, even on my own blog.  This is HER perspective:</p>
<p>PRIVACY &#8211; most blog comments ask for a name and email address.  Maggie is extremely cautious about giving her email for fear of being spammed, regardless of the blog owner&#8217;s privacy policy.</p>
<p>TOO MUCH WORK &#8211; some blog comments make you jump through too many hoops &#8211; register, wait for confirmation email, login&#8230; by the time a person gets through all that, they are too ticked off to leave a comment.</p>
<p>Speaking of different perspectives but on a completely different tangent:</p>
<p>We were talking with my little six-year-old step daughter about the possibility of getting a little kitty next year when her older sister goes to live with her dad.  The conversation turned to the many responsibilities of pet ownership.  One of the things we discussed was veterinarians (vets).  Curious, my little one asked, &#8220;Russy, what&#8217;s a vet?&#8221;</p>
<p>I answered, &#8220;It&#8217;s an animal doctor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ambrosia returned surprised, &#8220;You mean it&#8217;s not a person?&#8221;</p>
<p>It took me a second to realize that she HEARD me say that the animal doctor was&#8230; AN ANIMAL!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what we get from watching too much &#8216;Treehouse&#8217;.  LOL</p>
<p>But it also proves that we ALL have different perspectives.  There is NO END to the many different permutations and spins we can have on any topic.  </p>
<p>Bottom line again&#8230; your comments add so much value and enrichment to your favorite blogger&#8217;s posts.  I know I am ALWAYS delighted to get any kind of comment because it means I have an audience with a pulse, and I am stimulating them enough to elicit a response.  </p>
<p>I join Charles in encouraging every reader to leave a response if the articles move you, enlighten you, or simply entertain you in some way.  It&#8217;s why bloggers write!</p>
<p>All the best from Toronto,<br />
Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Hey Charles

When you first mentioned this during our phone conversation, I was wondering where you would go with this.  I remember you pausing and saying, &quot;Russ, that just gave me a great idea!&quot;  Then you proceeded to tell me about the pigeons in the park, but I have to admit, I didn&#039;t completely catch your concept right away.  

Yes, this is a brilliant insight!  

But you know what?  We are ALL capable of having these brilliant insights.  Maggie is constantly &#039;amazed&#039; at how I can turn what she thinks is an ordinary, every day occurrence into a full-blown blog article with a real message.  And I&#039;m thinking, &quot;Dude... we ALL have experiences.  And we all have our own unique perspectives.  Whenever I hear something from another person&#039;s point of view, it EXPANDS MY OWN MIND!&quot;

In defense of our readers, Charles, I&#039;d like to offer up a couple of other observations that I&#039;ve noticed in myself.  I&#039;ve got a growing family/friend reunion on FaceBook.  I spend a good 20-30 minutes there keeping up with the pulse of my group.  That takes TIME.

I have other blogs I frequent.  I read.  I get ideas.  I see those blogs already have 50+ comments.  Mine would only get lost in all the noise anyway, so I exit quietly out the back door.  On blogs like yours and mine, most of the time I DO leave a message - but that&#039;s ME... I can&#039;t seem to shut up.

Then there are the forums!  I write full-blown articles there, too!  Again, that takes TIME!

I would guess that for most people, it&#039;s a time issue.  When we come to blogs we tend to just want to be entertained and/or informed.  All that FaceBook, high-traffic blogs and forum interaction in addition to our &#039;real world&#039; responsibilities has us just tuckered out.

However, I look at my visitor stats and notice that a good percentage are spending an hour or more on my site.  People are reading, that&#039;s for sure.

Then again, writing in a vacuum can be a bit disheartening sometimes.  I love to know what people think, even if they disagree (as they did on my now infamous &#039;hot&#039; article)  LOL

As for the quick, &quot;I really liked this article - keep it up!&quot;... many blog spam filters actually block these!  I know other bloggers who remove these &#039;quickies&#039; because they don&#039;t add VALUE to the conversation.  So sometimes we bloggers can seem a bit ungrateful as well!

I see BOTH sides of this issue.  I&#039;m certain there are many, many more reasons people don&#039;t comment.

Looks like this post got your desired result.  That was an interesting experiment.

All the best from Toronto,
Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Charles</p>
<p>When you first mentioned this during our phone conversation, I was wondering where you would go with this.  I remember you pausing and saying, &#8220;Russ, that just gave me a great idea!&#8221;  Then you proceeded to tell me about the pigeons in the park, but I have to admit, I didn&#8217;t completely catch your concept right away.  </p>
<p>Yes, this is a brilliant insight!  </p>
<p>But you know what?  We are ALL capable of having these brilliant insights.  Maggie is constantly &#8216;amazed&#8217; at how I can turn what she thinks is an ordinary, every day occurrence into a full-blown blog article with a real message.  And I&#8217;m thinking, &#8220;Dude&#8230; we ALL have experiences.  And we all have our own unique perspectives.  Whenever I hear something from another person&#8217;s point of view, it EXPANDS MY OWN MIND!&#8221;</p>
<p>In defense of our readers, Charles, I&#8217;d like to offer up a couple of other observations that I&#8217;ve noticed in myself.  I&#8217;ve got a growing family/friend reunion on FaceBook.  I spend a good 20-30 minutes there keeping up with the pulse of my group.  That takes TIME.</p>
<p>I have other blogs I frequent.  I read.  I get ideas.  I see those blogs already have 50+ comments.  Mine would only get lost in all the noise anyway, so I exit quietly out the back door.  On blogs like yours and mine, most of the time I DO leave a message &#8211; but that&#8217;s ME&#8230; I can&#8217;t seem to shut up.</p>
<p>Then there are the forums!  I write full-blown articles there, too!  Again, that takes TIME!</p>
<p>I would guess that for most people, it&#8217;s a time issue.  When we come to blogs we tend to just want to be entertained and/or informed.  All that FaceBook, high-traffic blogs and forum interaction in addition to our &#8216;real world&#8217; responsibilities has us just tuckered out.</p>
<p>However, I look at my visitor stats and notice that a good percentage are spending an hour or more on my site.  People are reading, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p>Then again, writing in a vacuum can be a bit disheartening sometimes.  I love to know what people think, even if they disagree (as they did on my now infamous &#8216;hot&#8217; article)  LOL</p>
<p>As for the quick, &#8220;I really liked this article &#8211; keep it up!&#8221;&#8230; many blog spam filters actually block these!  I know other bloggers who remove these &#8216;quickies&#8217; because they don&#8217;t add VALUE to the conversation.  So sometimes we bloggers can seem a bit ungrateful as well!</p>
<p>I see BOTH sides of this issue.  I&#8217;m certain there are many, many more reasons people don&#8217;t comment.</p>
<p>Looks like this post got your desired result.  That was an interesting experiment.</p>
<p>All the best from Toronto,<br />
Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hey Mr. Burke--

As always, spot on and good food for thought.

And Thank You.

One thing that keeps me from commenting or posting more actively otherwhere 
(Hi Susan!) is that it feels like I have to have something to add to the conversation.

I guess you&#039;re right, though.  &quot;Thanks, I needed that.&quot; is sometimes just enough.

Continue Rocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mr. Burke&#8211;</p>
<p>As always, spot on and good food for thought.</p>
<p>And Thank You.</p>
<p>One thing that keeps me from commenting or posting more actively otherwhere<br />
(Hi Susan!) is that it feels like I have to have something to add to the conversation.</p>
<p>I guess you&#8217;re right, though.  &#8220;Thanks, I needed that.&#8221; is sometimes just enough.</p>
<p>Continue Rocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlesB</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Susan, thanks for the feedback - I&#039;m glad to hear you got something from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, thanks for the feedback &#8211; I&#8217;m glad to hear you got something from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Happiness of Generosity</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>The Happiness of Generosity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] opened a door for me tonight with a very thought-provoking article he wrote called “Feeding Pigeons in the Park.” He was talking about the way most of us tend to read a piece on a blog and then surf away to read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opened a door for me tonight with a very thought-provoking article he wrote called “Feeding Pigeons in the Park.” He was talking about the way most of us tend to read a piece on a blog and then surf away to read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Wow, Charles!  What a beautiful, thought-provoking piece!  Thank you.

I&#039;m choosing to abandon my habit of omission right this very minute.  And know what?  Already I feel bigger, more involved, and yes, happy.  

I never consciously thought of blog-reading as opportunity to engage in a relationship--however momentary--with the writer.  And yet, I gain so much, so often, from my reading.  The very least I can do in response is say, &quot;Thanks!&quot;    

So thank YOU!  What a door-opening article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Charles!  What a beautiful, thought-provoking piece!  Thank you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m choosing to abandon my habit of omission right this very minute.  And know what?  Already I feel bigger, more involved, and yes, happy.  </p>
<p>I never consciously thought of blog-reading as opportunity to engage in a relationship&#8211;however momentary&#8211;with the writer.  And yet, I gain so much, so often, from my reading.  The very least I can do in response is say, &#8220;Thanks!&#8221;    </p>
<p>So thank YOU!  What a door-opening article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlesB</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Gene - I agree... and you might say I posted this article as an experiment - I was curious too. . .

Sandy - thanks for the feedback. So tell me, what was the main takeaway you got from it?

Judy - aw shucks (digging toe in the dirt). If you liked the early teleseminars, I think you&#039;ll especially like some that I&#039;m planning for the coming months. I&#039;ll be trying new things, pushing the envelope a bit farther than I have in the past.  Almost always agree? Thanks for the vote of confidence, but it may also mean I should be pushing that envelope even harder. Thanks for letting me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene &#8211; I agree&#8230; and you might say I posted this article as an experiment &#8211; I was curious too. . .</p>
<p>Sandy &#8211; thanks for the feedback. So tell me, what was the main takeaway you got from it?</p>
<p>Judy &#8211; aw shucks (digging toe in the dirt). If you liked the early teleseminars, I think you&#8217;ll especially like some that I&#8217;m planning for the coming months. I&#8217;ll be trying new things, pushing the envelope a bit farther than I have in the past.  Almost always agree? Thanks for the vote of confidence, but it may also mean I should be pushing that envelope even harder. Thanks for letting me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SANDY</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>SANDY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-59</guid>
		<description>THAT WAS VERY INTERESTING, IT ALSO MAKES A LOT OF SINCE.  KEEP IT COMING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT WAS VERY INTERESTING, IT ALSO MAKES A LOT OF SINCE.  KEEP IT COMING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.bullseye-living.com/308/feeding-pigeons-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullseye-living.com/?p=308#comment-58</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;m through being a pigeon!

Charles, I&#039;ve been on your list for a long time and did a really early telesiminar with you. I still use the meditations from the seminar. And I can never thank you enough for turning me on to EFT, which I have used effectively for ending phobias as well as all kinds of physical things.

Your offerings are always thought-provoking and (you&#039;ll like this) I almost always agree with you! Wow!

Thanks for all you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;m through being a pigeon!</p>
<p>Charles, I&#8217;ve been on your list for a long time and did a really early telesiminar with you. I still use the meditations from the seminar. And I can never thank you enough for turning me on to EFT, which I have used effectively for ending phobias as well as all kinds of physical things.</p>
<p>Your offerings are always thought-provoking and (you&#8217;ll like this) I almost always agree with you! Wow!</p>
<p>Thanks for all you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

